Posts

In industrial projects—whether for waterworks, oil and gas, chemical plants, or power facilities—project specifications form the backbone of successful execution. They serve as a binding document between owners, engineers, contractors, and suppliers. Poorly prepared specifications lead to disputes, rework, cost overruns, and quality failures, while strong specifications minimize ambiguity and ensure compliance.

Improving the Efficiency and Reliability of Vertical Pumps

COMMON PITFALLS IN PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS

  • Ambiguity and vague quality statements.
  • Missing technical parameters that lead to misinterpretation.
  • Incorrect or outdated standard references.
  • Over-specification that increases cost unnecessarily.
  • Copy-paste errors from unrelated projects.

KEY ELEMENTS OF BULLET-PROOF SPECS

SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES

Clearly define what the specification covers and its purpose. Example: “This specification applies to all valves supplied for the XYZ project, including design, manufacturing, testing, painting, documentation, and delivery.”

STANDARDS AND COMPLIANCE

Reference all applicable standards such as ISO 9001, API 598, EN 12266, AWWA C500, NACE MR0175, and ASME B16.34.

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS

Specify measurable parameters including design pressure and temperature, body and trim materials, end connections, face-to-face dimensions, coatings, and operation type.

TESTING AND QUALITY ASSURANCE

Include hydrostatic testing, seat leakage testing, functional testing, inspection steps, and Factory Acceptance Tests (FAT).

DOCUMENTATION AND CERTIFICATION

  • Material certificates
  • Test reports
  • Operating manuals
  • Warranty statements

WARRANTY AND AFTER-SALES SUPPORT

Define warranty duration, responsibilities, and response time. Example: “Supplier shall provide a minimum 24-month warranty from commissioning, covering defective parts and labor.”

STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE TO WRITING SPECS

  • Start with project context.
  • List applicable standards.
  • Define technical parameters.
  • Add testing requirements.
  • Specify documentation.
  • Include commercial terms.
  • Review with stakeholders.
  • Finalize and issue the document.

EDITABLE TEMPLATE – PROJECT SPECIFICATION

Project Name: ________________________

Document No.: ________________________

Revision: _____________________________

Date: ________________________________

1. Scope

2. Applicable Standards

3. Technical Requirements

4. Testing & Inspection

5. Documentation

6. Warranty

CONCLUSION

Bullet-proof project specifications are not about adding pages—they are about clarity, measurability, and enforceability. Covering scope, standards, technical requirements, testing, documentation, and warranty ensures reduced risk, controlled cost, and improved project outcomes.

In North America, valve requirements are defined by multiple complementary standards that cover design, ratings, leakage acceptance, fire-safety, emissions, and waterworks performance.

  • ASME B16.34 — Design, materials, wall thickness, P–T ratings, marking, baseline tests.
  • API 598 — General inspection and testing for isolation valves.
  • API 6D / ISO 14313 — Pipeline valve integrity (DBB/DIB, cavity relief, gas seat tests, torque).
  • MSS SP-61 — Common pressure-testing practice for steel valves.
  • FCI/ANSI 70-2 — Control valve leakage Classes II–VI.
  • API 607 / API 6FA — Fire tests; ISO 10497 global equivalent.
  • API 641 / 622 / 624 — Low-emission standards.
  • AWWA Series — Waterworks standards (C509, C515, C504, C507).

Valve Test Standards

ASME B16.34 — THE CONSTRUCTION & RATING SPINE

ASME B16.34 covers metallic valves and defines pressure–temperature ratings, material groups, minimum wall thickness, marking, and baseline pressure tests.

Practical use:

  • Select material per chemistry and temperature.
  • Confirm P–T rating for worst-case condition.
  • Use ASME B16.5/B16.47 for flanges.

Spec line: “Valves shall conform to ASME B16.34 for design, materials, wall thickness, and P–T ratings.”

API 598 — THE EVERYDAY INSPECTION & TEST STANDARD

Defines hydrostatic shell and seat tests, low-pressure gas tests, backseat tests, and operational checks.

Acceptance:

  • Soft seats: zero visible leakage.
  • Metal seats: limited visible leakage allowed.
  • Check valves: specific criteria apply.

Engineer’s tip: shell test hydro, seat test per API 598, add low-pressure air test for soft seats.

API 6D — PIPELINE VALVES

Includes DBB/DIB verification, cavity relief, high-pressure gas seat tests, torque checks, and documentation requirements. Stricter than API 598.

Spec line: “Pipeline valves shall meet API 6D, verify DIB as specified, cavity relief, gas seat tests, torque.”

MSS SP-61 — STEEL VALVES TESTING

Standard pressure-testing practice for steel valves. Commonly used where API 598 is not mandated and often paired with ASME B16.34.

FCI/ANSI 70-2 — CONTROL VALVE SHUTOFF

Defines Classes II–VI for control valve seat leakage. Class IV is typical default; Class V/VI used for demanding services.

Spec line: “Control valve shutoff shall meet FCI 70-2 Class IV unless otherwise specified.”

FIRE-SAFE TESTING

Fire test standards include API 607, API 6FA, and ISO 10497. Valves are exposed to fire while pressurized to measure primary and secondary leakage.

Spec line: “Valves in hydrocarbon service shall be fire-tested per API 607 or API 6FA/ISO 10497.”

LOW EMISSIONS STANDARDS

Low-emission requirements include API 641 for quarter-turn valves, API 622 for packing, and API 624 for rising-stem valves.

Spec line: “Valves in VOC service shall meet API 641 or API 624 with API 622 packing.”

WATERWORKS — AWWA

AWWA standards apply to potable water valves and differ from API/ASME in pressure classes, coatings, torque expectations, and service conditions.

FACTORY ACCEPTANCE TESTS (FATs)

  • Hydrostatic shell test ~1.5× rating.
  • Directional hydro seat test.
  • Low-pressure air seat test (soft seats).
  • Backseat test (if provided).
  • Operational/torque checks.
  • Special tests: fire-safe, FE, cryogenic, vacuum, DBB/DIB.

ACCEPTANCE & DOCUMENTATION

  • Soft seats: zero leakage.
  • Metal seats: limited leakage per API/ISO.
  • MTCs, calibrations, test records, markings, fire-safe/FE certificates.

API VS EN/ISO DIFFERENCES

API focuses on procedural testing and visual acceptance, while EN/ISO uses numeric leakage classes. Projects often blend the two.

Example: “Shell per API 598; Seat per ISO 5208, Rate A.”

EXAMPLE SPECIFICATION LANGUAGE

  • Isolation valves: ASME B16.34 design, API 598 tests, ISO 5208 leakage rates.
  • Pipeline valves: API 6D, DBB/DIB, cavity relief, gas seat tests.
  • Control valves: IEC 60534-4, FCI 70-2 Class IV.
  • Fire-safe: API 607/6FA/ISO 10497.
  • Low emissions: API 641/624/622.
  • Waterworks: AWWA + NSF coatings.

COMMON PITFALLS

  • Over-specifying Class VI for control valves.
  • Skipping gas seat tests for gas service.
  • Confusing DBB vs DIB terminology.
  • Not specifying soft-seat air test.
  • Mixing AWWA with API without caution.